We
often wonder what lurks in the hearts of beasts, but how far “down” the
phylogenic (evolutionary) tree does a “theory
of mind” go? It’s easy to understand that another human has a theory of
mind, and perhaps also dogs and cats and other smart animals, but do ants and
frogs and lizards understand that others have desires and intentions different
from their own?
There
is now claimed to be the first published scientific evidence that reptiles can
learn through imitation; that is,
they not only mimic what they see but also understand the intention behind the
action. This is different from emulation,
which is mimicking what is seen without understanding intention.
Some
herpetologists took a few lizards out of their natural environment and subjected
them to a learning test that did not emulate natural behavior, yet the reptiles
consistently got it right. A food item (mealworm) was placed under a wire
trapdoor that could be slid aside by either the lizard’s snout or a forelimb to
reach the snack. A “demonstrator” lizard was taught to slide the trapdoor aside
with its snout, and test lizards then watched the demonstrator perform the
deed. All the test lizards quickly learned to slide the trapdoor aside with
their snouts whereas control lizards (that were not instructed) all failed to
open the trapdoor by any means.
The
scientists also pointed out that the snout was used by all the test lizards but
none of the controls. The latter used only their forelimbs to try to move the
trapdoor, suggesting that the snout-swing motion is not part of their “spontaneous
behavior.” In other words, these lizards used social information in order to
learn a new trick. Is this not evidence of a theory of mind in lizards?
This
is the original reference:
Anna Kis, Ludwig Huber,
Anna Wilkinson. Social learning by
imitation in a reptile (Pogona vitticeps). Animal Cognition,
2014; DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0803-7.